![]() |
| Julian Assange - expensive embarrassment for the UK |
Assange is claiming that if he is sent to Sweden, the Swedes will send him to the USA, where he could face the death penalty. This assertion sits awkwardly with the fact that Sweden is a long-standing and vocal opponent of the death penalty and itself is legally prevented from extraditing anybody to a country where they might face the death penalty, both by domestic law and European law. Sweden cannot extradite him to the USA - legal fact.
To be granted political asylum, a person needs to be able to demonstrate a well founded fear of persecution in their home country. Assange is Australian and it seems to me that Australians are uncritically on his side, preferring to think that the independent judiciaries of the UK and Sweden are complicit in a vast conspiracy to get him a lethal injection for publishing embarrassing information about governments. He would not be persecuted in Australia. He seems to be viewed as a modern day Ned Kelly there. I also find this somewhat bewildering.
So it seems to me that we actually have a self-important loudmouth, bogusly claiming asylum from a non-existent risk and citing fears for his life under a scenario that would require Sweden (not entirely the most right wing, vengeful ally of the USA) to break international law. On the whole, I am more persuaded that we have somebody who is cynically raising the spectre of a vast conspiracy to evade the deeply unpleasant risk of being called to account for a sexual offence.
While we're at it - Ecuador? Since when did Ecuador become a bastion of human rights that puts Sweden's record to shame? Were the North Koreans not answering their phone?
I wish that he were somewhere other than the UK, so that he would be somebody else's problem. Sorry Julian, I have long been suspicious of your motives. It's time for you to face the music and stop creating a huge problem for Britain and gargantuan legal bills that we British citizens will have to pay on your behalf. Piss off.

