Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Room 101

I’m aware that I have a habit of writing nothing on this blog for ages, then come in there with a big long blog entry that is so long it puts people off reading it. This is reducing my potential number of readers and is certainly reducing the number of comments I receive.

So forgive me, if you will, for indulging in something of a filler tactic. I have fallen into a habit with a good friend of mine that we send each other very short text messages about two things. The first is when one of us spots a celebrity. For example, when I saw Sir Ian McKellen at Homos Place gym the other week I sent her a text message just saying “Ian McKellen, Homos Place, MCR”. It’s a strangely satisfying thing to do. I shall share such things with you as well on the odd occasion that they happen (I live in Manchester, not Soho).

The other thing we do is send each other text messages about the small daily irritations of life. Sharing them with another really helps restore balance and sanity. I recommend that you do the same. Feel free to post your “Room 101” entries as comments.

The name, as I’m sure you know, is derived from a (still) very good TV show in the UK where celebrities come on and list things that would be in their own private Room 101 (from Orwell’s 1984). It’s rarely less than funny. Ann Robinson famously put the Welsh in Room 101, which is the only noteworthy thing I feel she’s ever done.

Anyway, here’s one I sent the other day to get the ball rolling.

Room 101:Daft young women who go to work in MCR in late October wearing sod all, whine endlessly about the cold & inflict suffocating extreme heating on others.

To make it more sport, if it’s possible to keep these within 160 characters (I’m too mean to pay for long text messages), it’s best to do so. On a blog I guess one could be more creative. Write them as haiku perhaps?

Friday, October 27, 2006

For a laugh

This is a slightly unusual blog entry for me. No stream of consciousness, no ranting.
I was sent this by a friend today and I thought I'd share it. It really amused me and I hope it amuses you too.
A week after my car was broken into, I still haven't got it back. It's all a bit of a pain now.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Hell hath no fury like a woman who needs a slap


So, Naomi Campbell has been arrested for assault. See the story here. Technically, I expect that she’s been arrested for battery, but I won’t go all lawyer on y’all.

As the title implies, I believe that she needs a slap. Sod counselling, just a slap. In Britain, it's now illegal to smack children, but I do believe it should be legal to slap adults who are really, really asking for it.

I’ve always found her completely insufferable and this doesn’t surprise me one bit. I completely fail to understand how anybody who consistently behaves so badly without actually doing anything interesting to balance it can attract the admiration of absolutely anybody. Am I the only person who thinks that she’s dense and spoilt? Sure, shooting to fame age 15 must be quite tough (especially for somebody clearly below average intelligence) but she sure as shit has enough money to buy counselling to deal with it. To be fair, it's alleged that it was her counsellor who she hit, so perhaps that won't work. Personally, I think she should be kept in a cage, away from the rest of us.

Diana Ross, amusingly, was arrested at Heathrow a few years ago for battering a security woman. She defended herself by saying she was a “diva”. Silly bint. I faintly forgive her though because she’s made some nice hummable tunes over the years. In Britain though, if a celebrity slaps somebody else, they get arrested. She and her publicity people were appalled that she was subject to the same rules as the rest of us. Welcome to Britain, sweetheart.

And while we’re at it, what do we think of Heather Mills-McCartney? I’ll leave that for another blog, I think. Let's just say that I'm going to take a bit of convincing that she's telling the truth.

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Unexpected poignancy

As you may know if you read the blog below, my father recently left my mother. I’ve no idea if they’ll get back together, or even if I want them to. If it means a significant chance of everybody going through this again if it reunion doesn’t work, it would be best for everybody for them to part for good.

This seismic event happened a fortnight ago and I’d not actually seen Mum since. Don’t jump on me with this one: my Mum and I are very much alike. We appreciate the offers of help and support but only want to see people when the time is right. We’re much the same when we’re ill. I knew that I had to force myself to keep contact to phone only until she suggested meeting.

I don’t think I’ll come to terms with calling that house “Mum’s” rather than “Mum and Dad’s”. I think she should sell it and buy something smaller somewhere else. Even if they somehow get back together, the place will be full of unhappy recent memories. I think she’ll do that.

We had a very enjoyable evening together, talking a lot and going for dinner in a nearby pub. Neither of us cried, although it was always under the surface. It’s the small things that catch you unprepared and thus likely to cry. I stayed overnight but lay in bed until Mum had gone to work. Again, it’s what she’d want: she hates saying goodbye. After she’d gone, I got out of the house quite quickly but noticed the odd sadness of noticing that the fridge and cupboards were full. It might be comfort shopping (which would be out of character) but instead I think it’s just that she’s never in her whole life shopped for just one person. She has no idea of how few things she actually needs, so the fridge is full and stuff goes to waste. This will upset her, I know.

I’m sure that people who have experienced bereavement know these feelings. You come to terms with the drive and the wardrobe being empty. You rehearse the right words to use and refer to “the situation”. But you’re not quite ready for the shock of seeing the shocking nakedness of your mother’s hands with no rings for the first ever time. You’re not ready for opening the cupboard and finding yourself implausibly blabbering over the unexpected sight of an unopened packet of ginger nuts. It’s truly strange.

Saturday, October 21, 2006

Thieving Salford Scallies


On the whole, I respect the police. Well, the English ones at least. I am not a fan of the Czech police one bit, who I invariably found to be parasitic and a general irritation. I always thought of them as wasps; seem to see them out everywhere in vast hovering numbers (at least when the weather’s nice); a generally malevolent presence and source of irritation without any apparent purpose.

The Greater Manchester Police called on me yesterday to tell me that my car had been broken into. They were down to earth but polite - first name terms straight away. They followed the rules by the book, for example by making sure that I didn’t see the twelve year old scrote who threw a brick through the driver’s window to steal my satnav. This, apparently, is because it’s not unknown for irate victims of petty crime to take the law into their own hands and give the kid a good kicking, even though the police are right there. Predictably, I find this idea amusing. It was also pretty obvious that the police would have been quite pleased to see somebody deliver a good kicking to the kid and his associates that he’d grassed up but professionalism precluded them turning a blind eye.

I won’t bore you with the details, but suffice to say that I was politely asked if I could take myself and my car to a police station a few miles away while they took this kid for “a word with his parents”. They promised to join me there in half an hour and keep me for no longer than half an hour when I got there. They were good to their word on both counts.

During my wait at the police station for the arresting officer to come and take my statement, I found out a number of interesting things. The first is unsurprising; the police deal with the dregs of society and generally have a slight gallows humour about society as a result. They were quite clearly pleased to be dealing with a punter (me) who was polite to them and keen to help without making a fuss or wallowing in self-pity. It’s only a car after all. To be more precise, it’s only a skoda.

I hadn’t paid attention when the arresting officer gave me his name so I didn’t know who to ask for. The best I could come up with to describe who I was looking for was “Late twenties, about five foot eleven, scouser”. This was a sanitised version of what I had really been thinking which went more like “Late twenties, nicely toned, cute, nice eyes, nice smile, about size 11 feet and surprisingly pleasing voice for a scouser”. I thought it best to find something between my description and theirs which would probably be “Male IC2” or something equally technical.

The policeman on the desk smiled wryly and said “They’re all scousers. Manchester’s policed by scousers and Liverpool’s policed by Mancs. It’s the only way they can all get a normal life when they get home.” I find this fascinating. The M62 evidently daily supports a partial swap of populations that police each other, presumably crossing in the demilitarised zone known as Warrington.

Anyway, they got the kid, I was able to confirm that the satnav they’d caught him with red handed was mine because it had all my data in it and they’re now confident that they can “finger” four scallies that they’ve been after for a while. They were quite open about this being a “nice job”. They were all a bit upset that this had happened at the end of their shift and they would miss the Liverpool football game as a result, but the job had to be done.

To make things even better, the immensely helpful skoda garage stayed open a bit late to take my car from me and keep it secure for a few days while they replace the bust locks and the window; thus allowing me to get the 0730 flight to Bucharest the following morning.

Cute policeman told me that the parents of the scally they’d found with my satnav seemed pretty likely to dispense some tough love over the weekend. This added to the “nice job” aspect, as this is apparently rare. It’s normal for such parents to smack the kid around for having screwed up their job, apparently. It seems that this kid had fallen in with the wrong crowd.

In a rather strange twist, I’m told that I am invited to go back and make a further statement about my feelings of what punishment the kid should get. I don’t approve of this. I want the kid (or his parents) to pay for the damage but it’s not the place of victims to decide punishment. We don’t have a system of sharia law in England, nor should we have. Victims of crime are hardly likely to come up with a proportionate response. Of course, I’ll have to pretend to be outraged to slightly balance the softy social workers who will be pulling in the opposite direction. It’s all nonsense though.

Ah, what a nice thought this is. Nice policeman has my mobile number and he’s promised to call me on Monday. Is it wrong for me to be looking forward to my rendezvous with a handsome man in uniform?

Monday, October 16, 2006

A human tragedy

This is a photo of a fifteen year-old who in Manchester today pleaded guilty to murder of a younger boy. He was duly given a life sentence with a minimum “tariff” of twelve years. It’s been the main story on the BBC news site all day. For those unfamiliar with English justice, this means that he will be inside for twelve years at an absolute minimum, no matter how contrite and unthreatening to society the parole board judges him to be. If he’s not held to be no threat to society, he will be inside for life without any further trial.

It’s a really very tragic story, of course. He cynically persuaded the younger boy to his house, made a sexual advance on him and, upon being rebuffed, apparently felt that he had to kill the younger lad as this was the only sure fire way of making sure that nobody would find out. This latter stage of the plan also appears to be premeditated as a contingency.

A few thoughts occur to me on this, in addition to feeling the pain of the family of the victim. The first is what the hell is going on with our society when a fifteen year old is so messed up about his sexuality that the fear of it being discovered motivates murder? Obviously, this kid had some huge psychological damage but it was a gay panic moment that caused the murder itself. The media is making a bit of a deal of the fact that he’s gay, which I can’t help but feel is probably helping create the circumstances that caused this murder in the first place.

I also did find the photo rather sad. This is obviously a kid who is really scared and he looks vulnerable too. This kid seems to me to be a bit of a victim too. Obviously, about 0.0001% as much of a victim as the kid that he killed with a frying pan and a knife, but a victim nevertheless.

Perhaps most disturbingly of all, I have to admit that I found him really cute. It’s something to do with the rabbit caught in headlamps look. Perhaps this explains my tendency to find occasional romantic partners who are both younger than me and generally also nutters? They’ve never been fifteen though, I wish to point out!

It’s all very sad indeed. I don’t think that vengeance is an honourable thing in a civilised society and I do wonder how this kid (who is a few miles from my flat I presume) is feeling tonight. Still, at least nobody in the prison’s preparing a lethal injection as I suspect they would be on the other side of the Atlantic.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Veiled racism or commonsense? You decide.

Britain is currently caught up in debate over the preference for (a minority of) Muslim women’s preference for wearing a veil is a Good Thing. Have a look at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/6050392.stm if you’re not up with the story.

I find it slightly depressing that the only time we have a debate about something like this (ie something that matters) is when a politician whose star is fading sees it as an opportunity to make a run for the deputy leadership of his party. Sorry Jack, mate, I’ve always thought you were OK, but nobody’s fooled by the timing here. A whole party conference just passed and nobody even noticed you. It was time for you to stir something up to get noticed again.

We have become scared to debate anything that might offend people in this country. To illustrate, speaking as a gay man, I’m totally happy for people to tell me they think I deserve to burn in hell. I’m happy for them to express these (shit) opinions as long as they don’t start the process there and then with a petrol bomb. It remains my absolute moral right to do as I wish, no matter how much they voice their disapproval. Equally, Muslim women are thoroughly entitled to wear whatever they wish, but it remains our right to give voice to the self-evident observation that it’s an impediment to fully functioning in our culture and that, frankly, many of them look like an obese version of Darth Vader and thus plain silly.

As I understand the law of England now, however, anybody having a pop at me for my sexual preference could be accused of a hatecrime. Equally, I could be accused of inciting racial hatred for the paragraph above. Sure, it might be bad taste and/ or unfunny to others, but it’s nothing to do with hatred. It is wrong to choke off a right so important as freedom of expression to protect a (non-existent) right to not be offended by the views of others. Britain has never had any right to be protected from being offended, nor should it ever have one.

If a person can’t do their job properly because of some traditional article of clothing, that’s unfortunate but surely just bad luck. She has to get another job which enables her to exercise her right to dress as she wishes, whilst still being able to perform properly in the job. Some jobs are incompatible with people’s traditions by their nature and denying this is the folly of dogma. All dogmatic politics and religion are, in my view, just institutionalised and ritualised cop outs from reality.

There’s something faintly disturbing about how a well reasoned, measured (if politically opportune or cynical) comment by one of yesterday’s men can cause such furore, followed by overwhelming support. What other latent views do we near universally share that could equally be ignited I wonder? I do hope that they’re benign.

I have a confession to make. This blog entry was originally posted as a comment on the very excellent ambulance driver blog http://randomreality.blogware.com/blog It’s worth a look at this blog if you haven’t already. The book of its previous entries “Blood, Sweat and Tea” is also a good Christmas gift.

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

This is a slightly more personal blog entry than normal. It’s all been a bit quiet on here for a while, since I’ve been on holiday (Dubai – bit crap, will explain why in another blog). Also, I came back to find a family crisis. I’m an only child so our family is small and we just don’t have crises. It’s not our way. Well, it wasn’t until now.

I found out that the day after I went away for a week, my father walked out of the family home, leaving my mother alone. This really did come out of the blue. They’ve been together for 37 years as happily as any couple I’ve ever known. Unlike many people I know, I was lucky to have a childhood in a home with a huge amount of love and stability. A stability that it’s hard to believe could ever be undermined. Sure, in the last few years they’ve not seemed to laugh quite so much as they used to, but I thought that was just work stress and getting older generally. It’s an unwelcome surprise.

Neither of them told me anything was wrong and yet (forgive me for mumbo jumbo potential here), I somehow knew that there was something very wrong somewhere when I was in Dubai. That’s one of the reasons I couldn’t settle and enjoy myself I think. I rebooked my flight and came back four days early.

I have a theory that the generally accepted stages of grief (Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance) are actually the fives stages of dealing with shock. People who have lost loved ones after long battles with cancer don’t seem to go through these stages in quite the same way that people deal with shock of loss from a car accident or heart attack. I go through these stages in immense speed when I see signs like “Pizza’s £2”.

Well, true to form, this is how I felt when I found out at work on Monday. My own stages of dealing with trauma appear to be slightly modified: Practical plan-making, Bargaining, Anger, Depression, Acceptance. At first it was all very matter-of-fact and about what practical steps I could take to try to reduce the stress load for both of them. Then I felt a bit shaken and by the time I’d gone out for a couple of drinks with my pal Vince, I’d got to the stage of randomly crying mid-sentence. I’m over that now I think, but it was a curious feeling. It hurts so much to think of them both being lonely with nothing I can do about it. It is a weird fact that my mother had never once in her near 60 years slept alone in a house until a couple of years ago when Dad was away for some reason overnight. That’s what comes from being from a huge family and marrying very young. Imagine how painful that loneliness must feel. Forgive me if I stop imagining it, as I may very well start to cry again in this public place.

As an only child of parents who have always seemed to be very in love and thus deeply co-dependent, I’ve always had as my deepest dread the day that one of them dies, leaving the other alone. Somehow, it seems that they are both experiencing this at the same time. Except, as my mother said, if you’re bereaved you don’t feel the same sense of having been voluntarily snubbed.

If you have kids, don’t have just one. There will come times in that kid’s life when they will ache for the experience of having a brother or sister, even one they’re not especially close to. They will need the strange reassurance of knowing the somebody else understands the full picture precisely.

Neither has a side love interest, but they’ve decided that they need to part, at least for six months. I don’t think that they’ll get back together, which might well be the best thing. I can’t believe I’m thinking this way.

Meanwhile many of my greatest fears spring to mind. I am sure that my father is self-medicating with whisky. I’ve seen several friends lose parents and close family to the addictive effects of a whisky bottle (it always seems to be whisky). There’s nothing I can do about that, so I just have to put it to some dark corner of my mind and try to forget about it.

At 37 years of age, the reaction to this is different to age seven of course. It doesn’t affect my own domestic life, the trauma on a personal level is much less. Against that though, middle aged maturity makes me more sensitive to the pain that each is feeling, I suspect. The sense of grief is more vicarious grief, rather than personal grief. Yet many of the same well-known thoughts have somewhat ludicrously pestered me: did I cause this somehow by something I did? Is there something I can do to keep them together? It’s ludicrous to have these thoughts deny one access to restful sleep, but it happens.

I keep having “September 12th” thoughts. That’s how I describe trying to deal with acceptance that something has happened that seems impossible and must have been a dream. I first had that feeling on 12 September 2001. It’s become a daily reality recently.

Yet in crises like this, one can’t help but notice the enduring strength of the human spirit. Although both are immensely sad, both my parents are getting by and I can see that they’re both taking comfort in the knowledge that things will get better. Mum is coping better than Dad, which doesn’t surprise me. My extended family were a great comfort to them both while I was away, which in turn is a vast comfort to me. I have called a couple to thank them for their support and concern. I’m suddenly forced to unexpectedly face one of my greatest dreads and I’m also getting by. Add to this the confusion of the fact that everybody else in the story is a week ahead of me in terms of reaction. That’s a very confusing feeling. But the simple fact is that life goes on and somewhere above the Manchester drizzle, I’m confident that the sun is still shining. I’ve been lucky that I’ve never felt the effects of the death of somebody close to me, but for the first time I can really understand how people get through the crisis.